tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post1705584403848631541..comments2023-08-26T07:39:14.787-06:00Comments on Schaffer v Udall: 2008 Colorado Senate Battle: Add Possible Conflict of Interest to Mark Udall's List of Energy-Related ProblemsBen DeGrowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13834102063921650816noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-37090526435285859642008-07-22T10:45:00.000-06:002008-07-22T10:45:00.000-06:00Udall has put his money where his mouth is. I cert...Udall has put his money where his mouth is. I certainly don't support anyone using a political agenda for profiteering, but investing it seems these investments are about supporting technology that America needs. He also hasn't done anything to support the specific companies he has invested in, just renewables in general. Shaffer on the other hand has showed his values by going against the State Department to make deals in Kurdistan and back companies in Sudan that contribute to genocide. His war profiteering is shameful.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18229688719058593022noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-12974336044719186012008-07-21T12:55:00.000-06:002008-07-21T12:55:00.000-06:00http://clutteredeclecticmind.blogspot.com/2008/07/...http://clutteredeclecticmind.blogspot.com/2008/07/ponder-this-for-moment.html<BR/><BR/>This is a question I pondered on my blog. <BR/><BR/>Wouldn’t it be interesting to see how many in Congress have a vested interest in pushing the global warming agenda?Ron Simpsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05401859974073059650noreply@blogger.com