tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post3360073156906818975..comments2023-08-26T07:39:14.787-06:00Comments on Schaffer v Udall: 2008 Colorado Senate Battle: Mark Udall Mum on Overlooking Reported Scandal in Interior Department AgencyBen DeGrowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13834102063921650816noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-48826598099268953392008-09-21T14:43:00.000-06:002008-09-21T14:43:00.000-06:00"What was it, exactly, that made this paragraph wo..."What was it, exactly, that made this paragraph worthy of taking the time to find another person with CQ access to source it for you?"<BR/><BR/>Nothing in particular, except that it drives you and your other troll friends paranoid.Ben DeGrowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13834102063921650816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-58178054443868070982008-09-21T12:57:00.000-06:002008-09-21T12:57:00.000-06:00Thinking a bit more about it, it seems awfully odd...Thinking a bit more about it, it seems awfully odd that you would outsource the research of such a banal piece of trivia to a "friend". If you were looking for an illustration of Udall's "family legacy" with the Interior Department, surely you could have found a non-subscription-required reference. I found 3 or 4 on the first few pages of Google results. What was it, exactly, that made this paragraph worthy of taking the time to find another person with CQ access to source it for you?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15228621519387719816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-52129534728333276462008-09-21T12:38:00.000-06:002008-09-21T12:38:00.000-06:00Ben, I'm sure your "friends" are happy to be contr...Ben, I'm sure your "friends" are happy to be contributing to political causes, I wonder if their employers who are paying for the subscription are.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15228621519387719816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-51110972212901760132008-09-19T22:36:00.000-06:002008-09-19T22:36:00.000-06:00Nope, Matt, you're wrong. Did you ever consider th...Nope, Matt, you're wrong. Did you ever consider that I may have outsourced the research to friends who are not at I.I. and not at the Schaffer campaign?<BR/><BR/>You know what they say what happens when you assume? Well, you can fill in the dots. <BR/><BR/>Of course, it doesn't really matter, does it? Your arguments get weaker and weaker.... and lamer, too.Ben DeGrowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13834102063921650816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-76791698293190953152008-09-19T21:58:00.000-06:002008-09-19T21:58:00.000-06:00"I have other sources for CQ."The Schaffer campaig..."I have other sources for CQ."<BR/><BR/>The Schaffer campaign of course!Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15228621519387719816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-38456677063334816142008-09-17T21:10:00.000-06:002008-09-17T21:10:00.000-06:00Hmmm... Nope. I doubt I.I. even has such a subscri...Hmmm... Nope. I doubt I.I. even has such a subscription. I have other sources for CQ.<BR/><BR/>Are you ready to comment on the issue itself?Ben DeGrowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13834102063921650816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-22471910677025148422008-09-17T17:34:00.000-06:002008-09-17T17:34:00.000-06:00Hmm, you have have a subscription to Congressional...Hmm, you have have a subscription to Congressional Quarterly. That wouldn't be the Independence Institute's subscription would it? You didn't use their non-profit resources for the purpose of this piece did you? That might risk the tax status of the Independence Institute.johnehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12432832262374097247noreply@blogger.com