tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post7175589954563205379..comments2023-08-26T07:39:14.787-06:00Comments on Schaffer v Udall: 2008 Colorado Senate Battle: Another Far-Left Hollywood Fundraiser for Mark Udall Raises More QuestionsBen DeGrowhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13834102063921650816noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-69840762538561547342008-09-28T17:34:00.000-06:002008-09-28T17:34:00.000-06:00Are *you* kidding me? You're apparently not a reg...Are *you* kidding me? You're apparently not a regular visitor here. If you were, you'd know that the Bush Administration's own numbers, not to mention the facts (since those two are seldom the same), show that domestic drilling would have no meaningful impact on prices at the pump for 30 years, and even then, would be easily offset by supply manipulation by OPEC. Oil is not a solution to an oil problem. Alternatives to oil are the solution to an oil problem. <BR/><BR/>Get your facts straight, then feel free to return.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15228621519387719816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-55757337340492402292008-09-28T12:23:00.000-06:002008-09-28T12:23:00.000-06:00I'm glad that they asked Udall about his energy pl...I'm glad that they asked Udall about his energy plan in the debate. He obviously has no plan. He thinks that domestic production is a crime. He has done nothing but block legislation that could lead the U.S. to energy independence. . . look at his record. .<BR/><BR/>http://www.friendsoftheuschamber.com/issues/index.cfm?ID=190<BR/><BR/>Are you kidding me?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06212915110582567115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-41124332634941850982008-09-26T08:24:00.000-06:002008-09-26T08:24:00.000-06:00So you also don't agree with that statement? Or t...So you also don't agree with that statement? Or the falsified picture? Is there anything in that article that you do agree with?<BR/><BR/>Mark Udall isn't helping to refute the opinion that Code Pink is the "dominant wing of the Democrat [sic] party" by attending a fundraiser where one of the attendees is a member? Can we assume that because McCain attended a fundraiser with Lynn Forrester de Rothschild that elitist multi-millionaire wives of international bankers are the "dominant wing of the Publican [sic] party"?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15228621519387719816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-92211645190120669052008-09-26T07:30:00.000-06:002008-09-26T07:30:00.000-06:00Please notice that's in quotes. If you have a diff...Please notice that's in quotes. If you have a difference of opinion, take it up with Mr. Bensing. I can imagine what he might say. In any case, Mark Udall isn't helping to refute the opinion with his fundraiser this weekend.Ben DeGrowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13834102063921650816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-16738962988479305982008-09-25T23:07:00.000-06:002008-09-25T23:07:00.000-06:00And they're the "dominant wing of the Democrat [si...And they're the "dominant wing of the Democrat [sic] party" because?Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15228621519387719816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-81198731135098921322008-09-25T21:27:00.000-06:002008-09-25T21:27:00.000-06:00The answer to your question is here:http://schaffe...The answer to your question is here:<BR/>http://schaffervudall.blogspot.com/2008/09/will-mark-udall-take-donation-from.htmlBen DeGrowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13834102063921650816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-60995314478381270932008-09-25T21:24:00.000-06:002008-09-25T21:24:00.000-06:00So, with that picture removed, care to illustrate ...So, with that picture removed, care to illustrate why we're supposed to be scared of Code Pink? Or why we're supposed to believe it's the "dominant wing of the Democrat party"? And when you're done explaining the relevance of the article, you can explain how attending a fundraiser where a Code Pink member attended has anything to do with Freedom Watch's ad on terrorism. Maybe it's best to just delete the whole post...Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15228621519387719816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-73604003961349899612008-09-25T21:08:00.000-06:002008-09-25T21:08:00.000-06:00You are right: The Townhall column even removed th...You are right: The Townhall column even removed the link, so I updated the post to reflect it.Ben DeGrowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13834102063921650816noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8114733480292395190.post-47691819573329455962008-09-25T20:01:00.000-06:002008-09-25T20:01:00.000-06:00I thought conservative types had a problem with "n...I thought conservative types had a problem with "news coverage" consisting of doctored photos, and by that, I don't mean the picture of Streisand and Udall. The "We Support the Murder of American Troops" picture is doctored. In fact, it even says "photo illustration" in the upper left corner. <A HREF="http://townhall.com/Common/PrintPage.aspx?g=99a781e0-4ce2-4d21-bd1b-65e350b3c050&t=c" REL="nofollow">That must be why it's no longer in the original article</A>.<BR/><BR/>BTW, that link is wonky. If it's working for you, you must have a Townhall.com email account.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15228621519387719816noreply@blogger.com