But there was this quirky observation from the debate that allows more boisterous audience interaction:
Udall's fans cheered his support of a line-item veto for the president, and Schaffer's responded to his support for strict-constructionist judges.In the spirit of "bipartisanship," here's a cheer for both of them. Because I agree with both those issues.
Quite simply, though, there are plenty of things on which I disagree with Boulder liberal Mark Udall. He can be right from time to time, but not nearly enough to give common-sense taxpaying Colorado consumers a rational reason to support him.